b***@artifex.com
2017-11-21 10:11:17 UTC
http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698767
Bug ID: 698767
Summary: Poor rendering of Multiple Master fonts
Product: Ghostscript
Version: master
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows 7
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P4
Component: Font API
Assignee: ***@artifex.com
Reporter: ***@artifex.com
QA Contact: gs-***@ghostscript.com
Word Size: ---
Created attachment 14475
--> http://bugs.ghostscript.com/attachment.cgi?id=14475&action=edit
example file
The attached file renders poorly compared to the ancient version 8.71 the
customer is using as a reference.
I *think* the fonts in question are all instances of a Multiple Master font
(Adobe Serif MM) despite the names. I am a little puzzled that we do seem to be
loading one font from disk (NimbusMonoPS-Regular in current code) apparently as
a substitute for Courier which the input file does not use, but is possibly
loaded by the Windows prolog.
Specific problems, when compared to the 8.71 output:
There are dropouts at the tops of curves in the body text, see for example the
h, s, a, p, e in "This chapter applies..."
Inconsistent stem widths, again see the h, p, t and r in the text "This chapter
applies..."
Capital letters are 'squashed' horizontally in some cases. See the D and B in
the bold text "Dialogic Brooktrout" and also the T and F in "TruFax".
Much less noticeable, but... lower case glyphs with a cruve seem to be somewhat
expanded horizontally. See the o in "For detailed hardware..." or all the
characters in 'boards' in the text "Dialogic Brooktrout TruFax boards"
Bug ID: 698767
Summary: Poor rendering of Multiple Master fonts
Product: Ghostscript
Version: master
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows 7
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P4
Component: Font API
Assignee: ***@artifex.com
Reporter: ***@artifex.com
QA Contact: gs-***@ghostscript.com
Word Size: ---
Created attachment 14475
--> http://bugs.ghostscript.com/attachment.cgi?id=14475&action=edit
example file
The attached file renders poorly compared to the ancient version 8.71 the
customer is using as a reference.
I *think* the fonts in question are all instances of a Multiple Master font
(Adobe Serif MM) despite the names. I am a little puzzled that we do seem to be
loading one font from disk (NimbusMonoPS-Regular in current code) apparently as
a substitute for Courier which the input file does not use, but is possibly
loaded by the Windows prolog.
Specific problems, when compared to the 8.71 output:
There are dropouts at the tops of curves in the body text, see for example the
h, s, a, p, e in "This chapter applies..."
Inconsistent stem widths, again see the h, p, t and r in the text "This chapter
applies..."
Capital letters are 'squashed' horizontally in some cases. See the D and B in
the bold text "Dialogic Brooktrout" and also the T and F in "TruFax".
Much less noticeable, but... lower case glyphs with a cruve seem to be somewhat
expanded horizontally. See the o in "For detailed hardware..." or all the
characters in 'boards' in the text "Dialogic Brooktrout TruFax boards"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.